|
Mars
Section Circular No. 4 1999 February 1–29 |
|
General This
Circular summarises the period 1999 February 1–28 (but with an
incursion into early March). On Feb 1, Ls = 91 deg., D = 7.9 arcsec., lat. of
centre of disk = 18 deg. N, with the planet’s declination at 10 deg.
south, some 5 degrees lower in the N. hemisphere skies than last month! At my
suggestion, Jim Bell included Circular No. 3 in the last Marswatch
Electronic Newsletter, with a circulation of 1,455 (only 1,355 more than
mine). More good news is that next month marks the start of the main mapping
mission of Mars Global Surveyor. The craft has achieved its final, more
circular orbit, and will hopefully take many high-resolution images. On the
MGS web site there is now the ‘Aerobraking Image Set’ available
for viewing and downloading. Recommended. National
Geographic has just published a new Mars book
with many recent images. I have not seen it, but surely it will soon be out
of date! (I am hoping somebody will send me a review copy!) A general
interest article by A.D.Andrews in the Irish Astronomical Journal was
copied to me by Tony Kinder, BAA Librarian. Titled ‘The Leviathans of
Tharsis’ its scope is self-evident, but I was surprised to find the BAA
1986 map, one drawing by myself, and several other drawings by past BAA
observers used as illustrations (Reference: 26 (1), 45–64
(1999)). John Rogers draws attention to several pieces in Nature for
1999 February 18 (397, 560, 584, 586, 589 and 592) dealing with volcanism on
the early Mars, recent volcanism deduced from crater counts, dune-fields,
etc., as revealed by the MGS spacecraft during the early phase of its
mission. On Mars
throughout February the N. polar cap appeared rather small, and at some
longitudes the dark rim seemed hard to see, or was absent. Parker’s CCD
images sometimes showed some white haze just S. of the NPC, and this was the
case in the most recent images of March 3 (CM = 5–12 deg.). White cloud
activity presently remains high, and the Equatorial Cloud Band phenomenon
(ECB) has been very conspicuous in the CCD images, especially in blue light.
Elysium was brighter in the afternoon, and Hellas brightened considerably in
early February, being markedly lighter than in the previous month, sometimes
with a brighter spot in its NW corner. The ‘Syrtis Blue Cloud’
has been imaged again by Parker. More observers are becoming active, and are
sending in work: thanks to S.Beaumont, A.W.Heath, Dr T.J.Richards and Dr
R.Topping for recent contributions. Rik Hill
e-mailed to say that his group at LPL were observing the planet every
fortnight (primarily to monitor atmospheric water vapour) with the 61-in
telescope at Catalina. He reports: ‘Our observations indicate the
possibility of enhanced dust south during the period a week to either side of
1 Feb.’ The Director e-mailed early data about the Valles Marineris
storm reported below, although this event occurred a little later in
February, as will be seen. I have asked Rik for more details of his work. Dust
storm over Valles Marineris! Rather
than report the mundane, this month’s Circular is devoted to the
story of a regional dust storm which was observed in the second half of
February. On February 21 David Gray (42-cm Dall–Kirkham Cass., with
x262–x415, Spennymoor, County Durham, Great Britain) observed
considerable obscuration of the markings and kindly notifed me at once by
telephone. I immediately issued an e-mail alert to about 20 observers in
Europe, the USA, Australia and Japan, and telephoned several UK observers who
are not on e-mail. The response was gratifying, although I have had no news
from Japan as this issue goes to press. Although we may not have caught the
precise start of this regional event, its decline and fall (as Gibbon might
have written) was well followed. I recently e-mailed Todd Clancy to ask
whether the dust has had any measurable effect upon martian atmospheric
temperatures, as revealed through his radio waveband work. Selected details
of the observations follow: Feb 19, 0700–0730
UT, CM = 101–108 deg, D.C.Parker, visual, 15-cm refl., from Chiefland,
Florida: Don e-mailed this observation after hearing about the storm. He may
have witnessed its start by noting a bright cloud on the terminator: ‘It
was very bright in integrated and blue light, but not especially bright in
red. On one occasion of excellent seeing, however, I thought it had a
peculiar hook shape, reminiscent of dust’. This must have been over
Xanthe at the CML quoted, perhaps close to Aurorae Sinus. (I await sight of
Don’s sketch.) Feb 19, 1756
UT, CM = 261 deg, T.J.Richards (Victoria, W. Australia): A nice CCD image
with his 18-cm OG, showing the Syrtis Major side of the planet completely
normally and in fine detail. Feb 21, 0210–0300
UT, CM = 12–24 deg, D.Gray: Most of the SW (S. following) part of the
disk was distinctly light, even in poor moments of seeing. A brighter,
elongated core was seen, especially in red (W25). This core was like a ‘V’
on its side, with the apex occupying the N. part of Margaritifer Sinus, one fork
running along or close to the Valles Marineris, and the other running off
towards the SW limb, covering part of Mare Erythraeum. Margaritifer Sinus was
quite invisible. Sinus Sabaeus was well-marked, but the ‘Forked Bay’
area (Sinus Meridiani) and the S. part of Mare Acidalium both seemed a little
obscured too. A more diffuse brightness covered the equatorial deserts from
the CM westward (Chryse, Xanthe, etc.), and this region was bordered on the
E. by a dusky curving streak. Nothing could be seen of Aurorae Sinus to the
west. Seeing was almost continually good throughout. Feb 21, 0600
UT, CM = 68 deg, Hernandez (USA): N. Margaritifer Sinus and Mare Erythraeum
are faint. Agathodaemon (W. half of Valles Marineris, between Aurorae Sinus
and Tithonius Lacus) is dark. Chryse–Xanthe bright in red light. To the
west, Solis Lacus is dark, and that region appears normal. (I have not yet
seen the drawing made by Carlos; it was most useful that he observed a few
hours after Gray, so that his observation places limits on the W. side of the
dust storm.) Feb 22, Gray:
Very windy and with poor seeing. Mare Acidalium on the CM. Bright cloud is
again seen from about the CM to the following limb. Feb 22, CM =
126–128 deg, F.J.Melillo (USA): Near-blank red light CCD images, but on
a small scale, and at too high CML to catch the storm. Feb 23, 0520
UT, CM = 40 deg, Gray: In fine seeing he found the Aurorae Sinus area very
faint (and it is drawn very ill-defined), but the Margaritifer Sinus and Mare
Erythraeum regions have darkened again, and are as dark as M. Acidalium.
Agathodaemon is dark, as is Solis Lacus. Chryse–Xanthe is light, as is
the whole of the following part of the disk: Candor, Tharsis, Tempe. All this
light cloud has rendered Nilokeras faint, and Ganges nearly invisible. By
0600 UT the Chryse–Xanthe area was less bright. As ECB had been
observed in these longitudes before the event, there was probably a mixture
of white cloud and dust. Feb 23, CM =
119 deg, S.Whitby (USA): With a 15-cm refl. Chryse–Xanthe bright on the
evening side, more so in red than in blue, but observer unable to see
anything else due to small aperture. Feb 24, CM = 81–93
deg, Parker (USA), 41-cm refl., CCD work (and below): seeing evidently not
very good, but Solis Lacus dark. Strong ECB right across the disk, including
the evening Chryse–Xanthe. The Aurorae Sinus region is not well placed. Feb 26, CM = 15–25
deg, Gray: The S. features look much as on Feb 23 (Gray), with Aurorae Sinus
still weak. Equatorial cloud present. I have not yet seen David’s
drawing of this date. Feb 26, CM = 75
deg, Parker: Aurorae S. is present but not dark: seeing is not very good. ECB
evident. Feb 26, T.Stryk
(ALPO, observation passed on to me by Jim Bell): observer remarked upon the
region of Candor–Tharsis, that was bright in red light. Certainly
Candor is also light in Parker’s February CCD images generally, but
whether it was enhanced during the storm I have not yet decided. Feb 27, CM = 52–67
deg, Parker: As Parker, Feb 26. Feb 28, CM = 33–61
deg, Parker: seeing looks better than on 24, 26, 27. Aurorae Sinus looks
normal in shape, but still perhaps less dark than usual, as it is definitely
not as dark as the (now clearly normal) E–W dark band of the Mare
Erythraeum. The ECB is incomplete at this CML, with some cloud in S. Chryse–Xanthe,
then unconnected cloud over Ophir–Candor–Tharsis on the a.m.
side. What is perhaps significant is that the images show the ‘canal’
known as Hydaspes visible as a halftone streak curving its way from the W.
side of Margaritifer Sinus to somewhere about the SW side of Niliacus Lacus.
This feature is rarely seen, though it was recorded as being dark during 1858–1871.
Did it darken by surface excavation at the NE edge of the storm? I wrote the
above description before I read Don’s own notes: he independently
noticed the Hydaspes, and drew attention to it. March 3, CM = 5–12
deg, Parker: good seeing. My impression of this CCD image is that some
residual dust shows up very weakly as a thin E–W streak in red light
just N. of Mare Erythraeum, and that there is a distinctly brighter cloud
(dust) in red light just NE of Aurorae Sinus. Extensive but diffuse
brightness is seen in Chryse–Xanthe (perhaps brightest in red light),
and in Tharsis and Tempe (the latter regions were brightest in green and blue
light). There is an ECB from the p. terminator to the f. limb. The albedo
markings look very nearly normal to me on these images. In character
and evolution the February storm was not very different from those of 1984
April (Ls = 132), 1990 October (Ls = 308) and 1997 June (Ls = 139), described
in past BAA Section Reports by the undersigned. If we accept the Feb 19
observation as marking the start, the storm was highly active and near
maximum on the 21st, but was already dispersing by Feb 23. On Feb 28 and Mar
3 only traces of dust remained. Thus the storm
began near Ls = 99 deg., which is seasonally a bit early compared with former
telescopic events which definitely began over Valles Marineris: my historical
research shows that the earlier storms (1924–1990 and ?1879) occurred
during the interval Ls = 132–357 deg., with most events near the
extreme limits. On the other hand, events which began in neighbouring
Chryse/Xanthe have occurred in the intervals Ls = 96–225 and 308–344
(from records between 1903 and 1992), and the 1999 February event thus falls
nicely within the first interval. Anyone else out there with more
observations of the longitudes in question? Steve Lee e-mailed me to say that
his group were to have obtained time on the HST on March 3, under CM 300
deg., and their results will be interesting to compare with Parker’s on
the same date (see above). HST imaging is to be much less intensive than in
1997 this apparition, as noted in an earlier Circular: the role of the
ground-based observer is again underlined by the our coverage of the dust
event. (And who says it is always cloudy in Great Britain?) The
next Circular As
I may be out of the country in early April I will attempt to issue a report
covering March 1–April 15 during the third or fourth week of April.
Therefore please report up to April 15 by, say, April 22. Reporting
data to the Section I am always happy to receive CCD
images by e-mail. Any urgent and important drawing can be scanned and
sent as an image file, but I do not want to receive routine drawings by
e-mail, because the vast majority are sent as hard copies, and that is the
form I like to compare (and archive) them in. Send mail to Cherry Tree
Cottage, 16 Upper Main Street, Upper Benefield, Peterborough PE8 5AN, Great Britain;
home telephone 01832 205387; home e-mail Rmckim5374@aol.com. (Do not use the
former e-mail address for my place of work (mckim@oundle.northants.sch.uk).)
Urgent faxes can be sent to my place of work on 01832 274052. |
|
Richard McKim, Director 1999 March 7 |