|
The
Crayford eyepiece mounting John Wall |
|
Journal of
the British Astronomical Association, 81 (2), 118, February 1971 |
|
Introduction Many
eyepieces suffer from unwanted deficiencies which hamper the serious
observer. Often as not the pleasure is taken out of observing whilst one is
struggling with a sticky and recalcitrant eyepiece tube. The problem of loose
fitting tubes and screw focusing mounts is equally irksome. These ills are
far too often found in inferior professional mounts let alone the poor
efforts of the novice constructor; and how many worthy observers are treated
to the delights of trying to get better focus out of a mount that needs
Herculean strength to operate it, or to see the evanescent surface of Mars
hopping all around the sky every time he even touches the focusing screw?
This may seem a colourful picture for those who own one of the many very
excellent mountings now on the market, but it is a fact that there are so
many bad ones fitted to too many good telescopes that do not deserve them. The
problem of designing a good positive action eyepiece mount cropped up during
construction of a 34-cm comet seeker; as the mirror is f/4, the focusing is
critical for this type of instrument. However, the problem was solved very
elegantly, resulting in the creation of an eyepiece mount of surprising
smoothness of action, positive eyepiece tube location, and the novel feature
of having a quick tube release for rapid eyepiece changing. Description The whole idea of the mounting is
based on the simple mechanical concept that if a tube is supported near each
end by two V notches, it will be restrained to movement back and forth
parallel with its axis only. The tube will also be free to rotate, but we are
not interested in the rotational motion, only in the four-point stability of
the V notches. The system is roughly analogous to the stability afforded by a
three-point support or tripod. If four wheels are substituted for the fixed V
notches while retaining the points of contact on the tube, and if these
wheels are so orientated that they rotate in the direction of movement of the
tube, then the tube will move freely in an axial direction without any side
play (Figure 1). |
|
|
|
In
the mountings that have been built, the tube which holds the eyepiece is a separate
detachable unit, which rolls on four small ball races set in two V
configurations. These races are attached to a support pillar, which stands
out from a facia plate fixed to the telescope. The tube is moved back and
forth on its ball race supports by a simple cross shaft fitted with focusing
wheels, which bears down under spring pressure on the side of the eyepiece
tube, opposite the supports. In this way, the tube is retained in the
mounting. The rotation of the focusing shaft is necessarily smooth due to the
absence of a rack and pinion, and the movement of the tube is quite
frictionless. The action is sensitive, light, and delicate, with a complete
absence of jamming, stickiness and side wobble. Due to the fact that the
eyepiece tube is not built integrally into the mounting as in conventional
designs, but is merely gripped between five points of contact, the tube may
very easily be removed. This is done by mounting the shaft-bearing bracket on
a hinge attached to the facia plate, so that the whole assembly can be pushed
up and away from |
|
the eyepiece tube, thus detaching the
fifth point of support – the focusing shaft – and subsequently
releasing the tube for removal. It is then but a few seconds work to change tubes.
It is possible to have several tubes per mount, each holding an eyepiece of a
different power. One of the tubes may even hold a Barlow lens, as is actually
the case in one of the mountings that have been constructed. As can be seen,
the design has a quick release and change feature which is very convenient,
when effortless eyepiece changing is a big consideration in observing (Figure
2). Finally, the mounting is simple in concept, and easily constructed. The
kinematic principle of stability inbuilt in the design enables it to work
quite well if built crudely, say, from Meccano parts – a feature not
shared by conventional designs. |
|
|
|
The
frictionless movement means that there is no need for a rack and pinion, as
the simple bearing of the smooth focusing shaft on the tube is quite
sufficient to move it. In fact, the whole system is so frictionless that a
felt pad must be fitted against the focusing shaft in order that the tube
will not wind itself out under the weight of the eyepiece when the telescope
is so orientated that the mounting is pointed toward the ground. The mounting is
generally made from aluminium alloy; the facia plate is a thick piece of
resin bonded paper or fabric insulation panel measuring about 150 x 127 mm.
The whole mounting protrudes from the facia plate by not more than 100 mm, so
that the assembly is quite compact; and this can be made more so by cutting
down the size of the facia plate, which is of liberal dimensions. The
focusing shaft and eyepiece tube are made from stainless steel, or they may
be made from hard brass, especially if chromium plated. Ordinary steel tubing
will give trouble through rusting, which will impair the smoothness of the
motion. The stainless steel tube and shaft were purchased quite cheaply in a
ground and polished state ready for cutting to length. Ordinary small ball
races are used for the tube supports, but these were shielded by metal covers
to protect the races from night dew, observer’s breath, dust, and so
on, and to retain grease. The
mounting has a pleasing appearance if made carefully, and has the complicated
look of expensive equipment. It is, however, neither expensive nor complicated,
but just a useful ancillary that will not degrade a good telescope or
exasperate its user. General
notes on construction It is not the purpose of this paper
to give a blow-by-blow description of how to construct every item of the
eyepiece mount, but a few helpful hints may assist those who would like to
make one for themselves. The
drawing of the general arrangement
(Figure 3) gives a complete overall |
|
picture of the mounting and the disposition
of the various parts, although a lot may be left to the ingenuity of the
constructor who makes his own version. The facia plate may be made from
metal, plastic, insulation material or wood; it is a base plate for
construction, and the means whereby it may be fixed to the telescope. The
eyepiece tubes may be made from brass, hard plastic, or preferably stainless
steel. This may be obtained from a mail order firm, already ground
cylindrical and true on the outside diameter (330 mm long, and 38 mm outside
diameter), and is enough to make four eyepiece tubes. The aluminium alloy bar
stock and angle, plus the piece of stainless steel rod for the focusing
shaft, may be obtained from the same firm, as also may the four ball races
and various screws, knobs, and so on. |
|
|
|
The
four ball race tube supports may be any reasonable size as long as they are all
of the same outside diameter; a recommended size is 13 mm outside diameter x
6 mm bore x 4 mm thick. The mounting of the ball race supports is quite a
simple matter, as all that is required are four short pillars all of exactly
the same length, each having a central hole drilled to accept a No.0 BA
screw. The screws will pass nicely through the 6 mm bore of the races too,
and so the four pillar and ball race assemblies may then be screwed directly
on to the central support. The central support may be made from aluminium
alloy angle, and screwed on to the facia plate. The
dew covers are optional, but are preferred to protect the ball races from
night dew and breath condensation, and to keep out the dust. They may be made
from tinplate, and bent up into box forms to cover the races, leaving
clearance for the eyepiece tube. Furthermore, holes must be drilled in the
covers for the assembly screws, and it is a good idea to put a small washer inside the covers next to the bearing, |
|
and of a diameter slightly smaller
than the outer race so that the outer races do not rub on the covers.
Finally, the races should be packed with grease before assembly. The four
eyepiece tubes must be turned or filed square on the ends, and the aluminium alloy
eyepiece adaptors turned to fit very tightly inside the tubes. A flat will
have to be filed on the spigot part of the adaptor to create a clearance for
the welding seam that runs along inside the tubing. The usual astronomical
thread may be cut in the adaptors to take the standard eyepieces. The other
ends of the tubes should have a light flange ring fitted, with the flange
diameter 1 mm greater than the tube outside diameter. This is to prevent the
tube from being wound right out, the flange interfering with the back ball
races. Conversely, the eyepiece adaptors should also stand proud in order
that the tube is not wound into the inside of the telescope, where it may
plummet unrestrainedly down onto the mirror. This interference device should
only be sufficient to prevent complete wind-out, and should not interfere
with the free removal of the eyepiece tube when changing powers. The focusing
shaft is mounted on a hinged bracket which is made from pieces of aluminium
alloy angle, and the bearings may be ball races, although nylon or PTFE
bushes will do; but if the mount is in brass, reamed holes to accept the
diameter of the shaft with no slack will be sufficient. The shaft should not
be greater than 6 mm diameter, as larger diameters will result in a loss of
fine focusing action. Plastic knobs on each end of the protuding shaft ends
will retain the shaft in situ. It may be necessary to fit a felt wedge
against the shaft to brake its action, in order that heavy eyepieces do not
move the tube when the mounting is not horizontal. The
hinged bracket carrying the focusing shaft may be fixed to the facia plate
with a good quality steel butt or hinge. This should have very little play or
looseness, and conversely must not be too stiff. The thumb lever for tilting
up the hinge bracket also doubles as the spring retainer. A suitable disk,
slightly smaller than the internal diameter of the spring, is fixed to the
back of the thumb lever, and a similar disk should be mounted directly
opposite on the facia plate, and should be so arranged that the spring is
straight when it is assembled and under compression with a tube in place. The
hinge bracket should have a stop to prevent it from overriding when a tube is
taken out and the bracket is released; about 6 mm of extra motion is all that
is required. Spring pressure is a matter of taste and of individual feel in
focusing action, but should be strong enough to retain the tube firmly. A
recommended rating is about 0.5 kg/cm. The focusing shaft should be placed
approximately half-way between the front and rear support races, in order
that equal pressure bears on all four supports for stability. Finally, do not bother to substitute the ball
races with PTFE pads. It has been tried, and it does not work. The whole crux
of the design is in the frictionlessness of the tube supports. The device may
be made up from Meccano parts with a little fiddling here and there, or
entirely from hardwood, with metal ball races and tubes, of course; but this
is up to the ingenuity of those who can work miracles with anything that
comes to hand. The
eyepiece mounting was invented by the author – who is a member of the
Crayford Manor House Astronomical Society – and was on show at the 1965
and 1969 BAA Exhibition Meetings. |
|
This paper led to the design and
construction of modified versions of the Crayford eyepiece mounting (Hollis,
A.J., Journal of the British
Astronomical Association, 87 (5), 517; Fletcher, D., Journal of the British Astronomical
Association, 88 (4), 412), which in turn instigated further
correspondence concerning the relative merits of the original design and its
variants (Wall, J., Journal of the
British Astronomical Association, 88 (6), 619; Hollis, A.J., Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 89 (2), 191). |